![]() |
|
|||||||
| Strategy Development Support for the development of custom automated trading strategies using NinjaScript. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 |
|
NinjaTrader Customer Service
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 6,499
Thanks: 109
Thanked 291 times in 280 posts
|
Marco,
You do not understand, you do NOT have to go to market replay. You need to enable intrabar granularity on your backtest. This is done with this link let me know if you do not understand it. http://www.ninjatrader.com/support/f...ead.php?t=6652 -Brett
Brett
NinjaTrader Customer Service |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 180
Thanks: 15
Thanked 72 times in 51 posts
|
Brett,
I did some tests in the past with adding a secondary dataseries for intrabar granularity, but came to the conclusion that it slowed down everything to the point it was unworkable anymore. But I'm willing to give it another try. So let's assume my main dataseries is Renko 4 and to get correct backtest results I have to add a secondary 1 Tick dataseries ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
NinjaTrader Customer Service
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 6,499
Thanks: 109
Thanked 291 times in 280 posts
|
Quote:
1 Tick series is going to add a lot of time to the backtest, I might suggest going with a 100 tick secondary series foe example. Would get you the more accurate results without so much of the performance impact. I hope you can now see why it is this way in the first place. -Brett
Brett
NinjaTrader Customer Service |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 time in 1 post
|
Hi Brett,
since I'm having the same problems with the renkos and don't quite understand what u try to tell us I have the following 2 suggestions: 1. why r u tellung us that it is better to take the open of the next bar instead the close of the actual bar. saying this 3 times and saying u won't change this doesn't make this argument correct or more viable. but if it is really better to use the open of the next bar, please tell us why! suggestion: just use Close instead of Open only for renkos - this solves the whole issue (regarding speed and accuracy), since u won't need tick granularity or whatever u suggested. at least it would greatly enhance the results without compromising time constrains since the results we r getting at the time being are basically worthless. 2. i would suggest that u at least should do some kind of popup (as long as u can't resolve the problem) to warn inexperienced users of your platform if they trade "live" off of the results they get with your platform which may be totally incorrect and so could cost them money. Hope I could help a bit to solve the issue. Pls correct me if I'm wrong. Thx, firstbrain |
|
|
|
|
The following user says thank you to firstbrain for this post: |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
NinjaTrader Customer Service
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 6,499
Thanks: 109
Thanked 291 times in 280 posts
|
Thanks for the feedback I will forward in and happy trading.
-Brett
Brett
NinjaTrader Customer Service |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Backtesting Renko charts | crimsonite | Strategy Analyzer | 3 | 01-15-2013 09:33 AM |
| Backtesting using Renko | shadowfax | Automated Trading | 6 | 10-22-2011 02:12 PM |
| Backtesting SBS Renko Bars | mr_dees | Automated Trading | 3 | 10-11-2010 01:37 PM |
| Renko Chart Backtesting | jeremymgp | Version 7 Beta General Questions & Bug Reports | 1 | 03-26-2010 03:47 AM |
| Backtesting Renko Bars | jeremymgp | Automated Trading | 3 | 10-05-2009 09:16 AM |